The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so true to the original

Aside from whether The Last of Us Part I is worth the $70 asking price, the question surrounding this remake is how much the original 2013 game was going to change. Would developer Naughty Dog treat this as a total do-over, changing the level design, gameplay mechanics and player upgrades? It has become obvious over the last few weeks, as Sony released a handful of preview videos, that that wouldn’t be the case. Instead, the game directors told Engadget that the goal was to bring massively updated visuals and a host of quality-of-life improvements to a game that would otherwise stay true to its roots.

The Last of Us Part II Will Dismantle Some of What Fans Hold

Sarah Miller, The Last of Us Wiki

GTA V turns 10: The impact and legacy of Rockstar's biggest game

The Last of Us Part II': Ashley Johnson Navigates Grief and Guilt

Brexit Meaning and Impact: The Truth About the U.K. Leaving the EU

Avengers: Endgame Directors Explain the Old Captain America Time

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Last of Us Part II: Why has the game divided the community so

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Case Against the Trauma Plot