Subgroup analyses may be misleading - Students 4 Best Evidence

Findings based on results for subgroups of people within a treatment comparison may be misleading. These analyses are often poorly planned and reported.

JCM, Free Full-Text

Reference Collection to push back against Common Statistical Myths - data analysis - Datamethods Discussion Forum

Interpreting the results of noninferiority trials—a review

Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework

Relapse in clinically stable adult patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: evidence-based criteria derived by equipercentile linking and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis - The Lancet Psychiatry

Is Target-Based Drug Discovery Efficient? Discovery and “Off-Target” Mechanisms of All Drugs

Subgroup analyses may be misleading, If conclusions are made that a treatment is effective based on subgroup analysis alone, those conclusions may well be misleading. Read the full

Medical Management Versus Endovascular Treatment for Large-Vessel Occlusion Anterior Circulation Stroke With Low NIHSS

Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review

Massive hemorrhage: a very deep dive - First10EM

Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses

IZA World of Labor - Using instrumental variables to establish causality

5 Tips for Understanding Data in Meta-Analyses - Absolutely Maybe

Biostatistics Primer: What a Clinician Ought to Know: Subgroup Analyses - ScienceDirect

IJERPH, Free Full-Text